Danny joined the University of Stirling in the autumn of 2012 as a Senior Lecturer after academic positions at the Gibson Institute for Land, Food and Environment, Queen's University Belfast. He is currently a Professor of Economics within the Economics Division of the Stirling Management School.
Danny is an applied economist working in the of economic valuation of environmental and natural resources, food choice analysis and economics of public health. His particular interest lies in exploring methodological and econometric aspects associated with discrete choice methods. His work has focused on preference discontinuity, attribute non-attendance, preference heterogeneity, experimental design, spatial issues and learning/fatigue effects in discrete choice experiments.
¿ Associate Editor of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
¿ Associate Editor of the Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
¿ Ph.D. Director of the Scottish Graduate Programme in Economics.
Grilli G, Notaro S & Campbell D (2018) Including Value Orientations in Choice Models to Estimate Benefits of Wildlife Management Policies. Ecological Economics, 151, pp. 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.035
Budziński W, Campbell D, Czajkowski M, Demšar U & Hanley N (2018) Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69 (3), pp. 606-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12260
Sandorf ED & Campbell D (2018) Accommodating satisficing behaviour in stated choice experiments (Forthcoming/Available Online). European Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jby021
Van Loo E, Nayga R, Campbell D, Seo H & Verbeke W (2018) Using eye tracking to account for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45 (3), pp. 333-365. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbx035
Campbell D, Morkbak M & Olsen SB (2018) The link between response time and preference, variance and processing heterogeneity in stated choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88, pp. 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.10.003
Erdem S & Campbell D (2017) Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques. The European Journal of Health Economics, 18 (9), pp. 1107-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0856-4
Campbell D, Morkbak M & Olsen SB (2017) Response time in online stated choice experiments: the non-triviality of identifying fast and slow respondents. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6 (1), pp. 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2016.1167632
Czajkowski M, Budzinski W, Campbell D, Giergiczny M & Hanley N (2017) Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68 (3), pp. 705-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0044-0
van Osch S, Hynes S, O'Higgins T, Hanley N, Campbell D & Freeman S (2017) Estimating the Irish public's willingness to pay for more sustainable salmon produced by integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Marine Policy, 84, pp. 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.005
Chorus C, Pudane B, Mouter N & Campbell D (2017) Taboo trade-off aversion: a discrete choice model and empirical analysis (Forthcoming/Available Online). Journal of Choice Modelling. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534517300684; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.09.002
Meginnis K & Campbell D (2017) Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey. International Review of Economics Education, 24, pp. 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2016.11.001
Campbell D, Boeri M, Doherty E & Hutchinson WG (2015) Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 119, pp. 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.018
Erdem S, Campbell D & Hole AR (2015) Accounting for attribute-level non-attendance in a health choice experiment: does it matter?. Health Economics, 24 (7), pp. 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3059
Campbell D & Erdem S (2015) Position Bias in Best-Worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97 (2), pp. 526-545. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau112
Campbell D, Vedel SE, Thorsen BJ & Jacobsen JB (2014) Heterogeneity in the WTP for recreational access: distributional aspects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (8), pp. 1200-1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.793173
Doherty E & Campbell D (2014) Demand for safety and regional certification of food: Results from Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland. British Food Journal, 116 (4), pp. 676-689. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2011-0266
Erdem S, Campbell D & Thompson C (2014) Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: Prioritising health service innovations. Journal of Health Economics, 38, pp. 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.06.012
Morkbak MR, Olsen SB & Campbell D (2014) Behavioral implications of providing real incentives in stated choice experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, pp. 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.07.004
O'Neill V, Hess S & Campbell D (2014) A question of taste: Recognising the role of latent preferences and attitudes in analysing food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 32 (Part C), pp. 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.003
Doherty E, Campbell D, Hynes S & van Rensburg T (2013) Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: An application to recreational site choice. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, pp. 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.056
Doherty E, Campbell D & Hynes S (2013) Models of Site-choice for Walks in Rural Ireland: Exploring Cost Heterogeneity. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (2), pp. 446-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12002
Hess S, Stathopoulos A, Campbell D, O'Neill V & Caussade S (2013) It's not that I don't care, I just don't care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity. Transportation, 40 (3), pp. 583-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9438-1
Campbell D & Doherty E (2013) Combining discrete and continuous mixing distributions to identify niche markets for food. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40 (2), pp. 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbs018
Stithou M, Hynes S, Hanley N & Campbell D (2012) Estimating the value of achieving "Good Ecological Status" in the Boyne River Catchment in Ireland using choice experiments. Economic and Social Review, 43 (3), pp. 397-422. http://www.esr.ie/vol43_3/ESRTOC43_3.htm
Campbell D, Hensher DA & Scarpa R (2012) Cost thresholds, cut-offs and sensitivities in stated choice analysis: identification and implications. Resource and Energy Economics, 34 (3), pp. 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.04.001
Al Hamarneh YN, Agus A, Campbell D, Crealey GE & McElnay JC (2012) Public perceptions of coronary events risk factors: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open, 2 (5), p. e001560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001560
Campbell D, Aravena CD & Hutchinson WG (2011) Cheap and expensive alternatives in stated choice experiments: are they equally considered by respondents?. Applied Economics Letters, 18 (8), pp. 743-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2010.498341
Hynes S & Campbell D (2011) Estimating the welfare impacts of agricultural landscape change in Ireland: a choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (8), pp. 1019-1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.547691
Campbell D, Hensher DA & Scarpa R (2011) Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (8), pp. 1061-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.549367
Hynes S, Campbell D & Howley P (2011) A holistic vs. an attribute-based approach to agri-environmental policy valuation: do welfare estimates differ?. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (2), pp. 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00287.x
Campbell D, Hess S, Scarpa R & Rose JM (2010) Accommodating coefficient outliers in discrete choice modelling: a comparison of discrete and continuous mixing approaches. In: Hess S & Daly A (eds.) Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and the State-of-practice - Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 331-352. http://books.emeraldinsight.com/display.asp?K=9781849507721
Campbell D, Hutchinson WG & Scarpa R (2009) Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. Environment and Planning A, 41 (1), pp. 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4038
Scarpa R, Gilbride TJ, Campbell D & Hensher DA (2009) Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36 (2), pp. 151-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp012
Campbell D, Hutchinson WG & Scarpa R (2008) Using mixed logit models to derive individual-specific WTP estimates for landscape improvements under agri-environmental schemes: evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. In: Birol E & Koundouri P (eds.) Choice Experiments Informing European Environmental Policy: A European Perspective. First ed. New Horizons in Environmental Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 58-81. http://www.e-elgar.co.uk/bookentry_main.lasso?id=4102&breadcrumlink=&breadcrum=&sub_values=&site_Bus_Man=&site_dev=&site_eco=&site_env_eco=&site_inn_tech=&site_int_pol=&site_law=&site_pub_soc=
Campbell D, Scarpa R & Hutchinson WG (2008) Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 1 (2-3), pp. 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-008-0012-6
Campbell D, Hutchinson WG & Scarpa R (2008) Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41 (3), pp. 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9198-8
Scarpa R, Campbell D & Hutchinson WG (2007) Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment. Land Economics, 83 (4), pp. 617-634. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647797
Campbell D (2007) Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random-Effects Models. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58 (3), pp. 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00117.x
Campbell D, Hutchinson WG & Scarpa R (2006) Quantifying the landscape beneﬁts arising from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme: results from a public survey. Tearmann: Irish Journal of Agri-Environmental Research, 5, pp. 1-12.