Skip header navigation

University of Stirling

×

Article

Rohbraugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin

Citation
Cameron R & Roca-Royes S (2006) Rohbraugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin. Mind, 115 (458), pp. 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzl361

Abstract
In ‘A New Route to the Necessity of Origin’, Rohbraugh and deRosset offer an argu-ment for the Necessity of Origin appealing neither to Sufficiency of Origin nor to abranching-times model of necessity. What is doing the crucial work in their argu-ment is instead the thesis they name ‘Locality of Prevention’. In this response, we ob-ject that their argument is question-begging by showing, first, that the locality ofprevention thesis is not strong enough to satisfactorily derive from it the intendedconclusion, and, second, that the argument is not sound unless the Necessity of Origin is operating as an implicit premiss.

Keywords
Necessity of Origin; Essentialism; Modality; Essentialism (Philosophy); Life Origin; Modality (Logic)

Journal
Mind: Volume 115, Issue 458

StatusPublished
Author(s)Cameron, Ross; Roca-Royes, Sonia
Publication date30/04/2006
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/866
PublisherOxford University Press
ISSN0026-4423
Scroll back to the top