Skip header navigation

University of Stirling

×

Commentary

The null hypothesis: a reply

Citation
Paley J, Cheyne H, Dalgleish L, Duncan E & Niven C (2008) The null hypothesis: a reply. Commentary on: Rolfe G. (2008) In response to Paley J., Cheyne H., Dalgleish L., Duncan E. & Niven C. (2007) Nursing's ways of knowing and dual process theories of cognition. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(2), 268-269. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64 (2), pp. 209-210. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=34571571&site=ehost-live; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04848.x

Abstract
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Nursing's Ways of Knowing and Dual Process Theories of Cognition" published in a 2007 issue

Keywords
3; advanced nursing; C; Cognition; email; Evidence based; EVIDENCE-based nursing; Information; LETTERS; LETTERS to the editor; NUMBER; Nursing; Theories; THEORY

Journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing: Volume 64, Issue 2

StatusPublished
Author(s)Paley, John; Cheyne, Helen; Dalgleish, Len; Duncan, Edward; Niven, Catherine
Publication date31/10/2008
PublisherBlackwell Science.
Publisher URLhttp://search.ebscohost.com/…&site=ehost-live
ISSN0309-2402
Item discussedRolfe G. (2008) In response to Paley J., Cheyne H., Dalgleish L., Duncan E. & Niven C. (2007) Nursing's ways of knowing and dual process theories of cognition. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(2), 268-269
Scroll back to the top