(Self-)Surveillance, Anti-Doping, and Health in Non-Elite Road Running

Citation

Henning AD (2014) (Self-)Surveillance, Anti-Doping, and Health in Non-Elite Road Running. Surveillance & Society, 11 (4), pp. 494-507. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/doping/runners

Abstract
This article explores disciplining effects of current anti-doping surveillance systems on the health consequences of non-elites' daily behaviors and habits. As they are left out of direct anti-doping testing and enforcement, it is tempting to argue non-elites are unaffected by the anti-doping efforts focused on the elite level of their sport. However, it is because they are not subject to anti-doping surveillance systems nor forced to comply with anti-doping regulations that non-elites are implicated within the wider arena of disciplinary power that envelops both elite and non-elite athletes and anti-doping agencies (Foucault 1979). Drawing on data from 28 interviews with non-elite runners, I argue these runners do conform to the rules and norms of their sport as far as they understand them, but their knowledge of banned substances is inadequate and many non-elite runners have only a superficial and sometimes incorrect understanding of doping. Many view doping and its associated health risks as a problem only of elite running, as well as a problem limited to only a handful of widely publicized performance enhancing drugs or doping methods. As a result of these misunderstandings non-elite runners are vulnerable to negative health effects of over the counter (OTC) medications and nutritional supplements, which they view as " safe " and part of normal training as a result of the current elite surveillance model of anti-doping. The recent death of a non-elite marathon runner linked to use of the unregulated energy supplement DMAA demonstrates that questionable products are used by runners who may not be fully aware of the risks of use.

Journal
Surveillance & Society: Volume 11, Issue 4