Masculinity, femininity and sex: an exploration of their relative contribution to explaining gender differences in health

Citation

Annandale E & Hunt K (1990) Masculinity, femininity and sex: an exploration of their relative contribution to explaining gender differences in health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12 (1), pp. 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10844865

Abstract
The emergence of gender as a major area of interest in medical sociology in the 1970s set an exciting agenda for future research. However, despite a growing literature, our understanding of the mechanisms linking gender and health has advanced little in recent years. This may, in part, be due to problems in conceptualising gender. In particular, despite theoretical advances, biological sex and sociological gender continue to be conflated in empirical research. In this paper we argue that sex and gender are not necessarily coincidental and that gender roles and gender role orientations may cross‐cut sex. We draw upon a recent tradition of research on gender role orientation in psychology which assesses the level of ‘bmasculinity’ and ‘femininity’ in an individual's self‐concept through identification with traditionally ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ characteristics. Considering a range of health measures we conclude that the sex (male‐female) differences that are traditionally found in research on gender and health may mask an association of ‘femininity’ with relatively poor health and ‘masculinity’ with relatively good health in both men and women. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Journal
Sociology of Health and Illness: Volume 12, Issue 1

People

Professor Kate Hunt

Professor, Institute for Social Marketing