Article
Details
Citation
Hope S (2013) Neo-Aristotelian Social Justice: An Unanswered Question. Res Publica, 19 (2), pp. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-013-9213-y
Abstract
In this paper I assess the possibility of advancing a modern conception of social justice under neo-Aristotelian lights, focussing primarily on conceptions that assert a fundamental connection between social justice and eudaimonia. After some preliminary remarks on the extent to which a neo-Aristotelian account must stay close to Aristotle's own, I focus on Martha Nussbaum's sophisticated neo-Aristotelian approach, which I argue implausibly overworks the aspects of Aristotle's thought it appeals to. I then outline the shape of a deeper and more general, and as yet unanswered, problem facing neo-Aristotelian accounts: how to justify the claim that the point of a just society is to assist or enable its members to flourish.
Keywords
Aristotle;
Social justice;
Ethical naturalism;
Nussbaum
Journal
Res Publica: Volume 19, Issue 2
| Status | Published |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 01/05/2013 |
| Date accepted by journal | 04/02/2013 |
| URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19599 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| ISSN | 1356-4765 |
People (1)
People
Lecturer, Philosophy