A Plea for Risk



Ebert P & Robertson S (2013) A Plea for Risk. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 73, pp. 45-64.

Mountaineering is a dangerous activity. For many mountaineers, part of its very attraction is the risk, the thrill of danger. Yet mountaineers are often regarded as reckless or even irresponsible for risking their lives. In this paper, we offer a defence of risk-taking in mountaineering. Our discussion is organised around the fact that mountaineers and non-mountaineers often disagree about how risky mountaineering really is. We hope to cast some light on the nature of this disagreement – and to argue that mountaineering may actually be worthwhile because of the risks it involves. Section 1 introduces the disagreement and, in doing so, separates out several different notions of risk. Sections 2–4 then consider some explanations of the disagreement, showing how a variety of phenomena can skew people’s risk judgements. Section 5 then surveys some recent statistics, to see whether these illuminate how risky mountaineering is. In light of these considerations, however, we suggest that the disagreement is best framed not simply in terms of how risky mountaineering is but whether the risks it does involve are justified. The remainder of the paper, sections 6–9, argues that risk-taking in mountaineering often is justified – and, moreover, that mountaineering can itself be justified (in part) by and because of the risks it involves.

Risk, Mountaineering, Philosophy of Sport; Mountaineering ; Mountaineering Psychological aspects ; Extreme sports ; Risk-taking (Psychology)

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: Volume 73

FundersArts and Humanities Research Council
Publication date30/09/2013
Publication date online21/08/2013
PublisherCambridge University Press

People (1)


Professor Philip Ebert

Professor Philip Ebert

Professor, Philosophy

Projects (1)