Article

Can we sustainably harvest ivory?

Details

Citation

Lusseau D & Lee PC (2016) Can we sustainably harvest ivory?. Current Biology, 26 (21), pp. 2951-2956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.060

Abstract
Despite the 1989 ivory trade ban, elephants continue to be killed to harvest their tusks for ivory. Since 2008, this poaching has increased to unprecedented levels driven by consumer demand for ivory products. CITES is now considering to develop a legal ivory trade [1,2]. The proposal relies on three assumptions: i) harvest regulation will cease all illegal activities; ii) defined sustainable quotas can be enforced; iii) we can define meaningful sustainable quotas that come close to the current demand. We know that regulating harvest does not stop illegal takes. Despite whaling regulation after WWII, illegal whaling continued for decades [3]. The introduction of wolf culls in the USA actually increased poaching activities [4] while one-off ivory sales in 1999 and 2008 did nothing to halt elephant poaching. Governance issues over the ivory supply chains, including stockpiling, make enforcing quotas challenging if not impossible [5,6]. We have not yet adequately assessed what could be a sustainable ivory yield. To do so, we develop a compartmental model composed of a two-sex age-structured demographic model and an ivory production and harvest model. We applied several offtake and quota strategies to define how much ivory could be sustainably harvested. We found that the sustainability space is very small. Only 100 to 150kg of ivory could be removed from a reference population of 1360 elephants, levels well below the current demand. Our study shows that lifting the ivory ban will not address the current poaching challenge. We should instead focus on reducing consumer demand.

Keywords
sustainability; conservation; wildlife management; elephants; ivory harvesting; wildlife exploitation

Journal
Current Biology: Volume 26, Issue 21

StatusPublished
Publication date07/11/2016
Publication date online15/09/2016
Date accepted by journal23/08/2016
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24162
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0960-9822