Article
Details
Citation
Melis G (2026) The study of inference in philosophy and comparative psychology. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 58 (172), pp. 127-157. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2026.1785
Abstract
I compare the study of inference in some philosophical and psychological traditions, and I make three general points. First, I suggest that in both human and non-human animals, inference is a means of by which subjects aim to achieve an accurate and coherent representation of the world. Second, I contend that philosophical work on rational dispositions and empirical research on reasoning help to outline an unreflective notion of taking the premises to support the conclusion. Third, I claim that paying attention to the distinction between logic and reasoning is important to fine-tune the standards for observation of deductive reasoning in empirical research.
Keywords
Animal Rationality; Taking Condition; Epistemic Feelings; Logic vs Reasoning; Two Cup Task
Notes
1
| Status | Published |
|---|---|
| Funders | Medical Research Council |
| Publication date | 31/05/2026 |
| Publication date online | 31/05/2026 |
| Date accepted by journal | 10/03/2026 |
| eISSN | 1870-4905 |