Skip header navigation
×

Article

Exclusive choice of court agreements: some issues on the Hague Convention on choice of court agreements and its relationship with the Brussels I recast especially anti-suit injunctions, concurrent proceedings and the implications of BREXIT

Citation
Ahmed M & Beaumont P (2017) Exclusive choice of court agreements: some issues on the Hague Convention on choice of court agreements and its relationship with the Brussels I recast especially anti-suit injunctions, concurrent proceedings and the implications of BREXIT. Journal of Private International Law, 13 (2), pp. 386-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2017.1348782

Abstract
This article contends that the system of “qualified” or “partial” mutual trust in the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention (“Hague Convention”) may permit anti-suit injunctions, actions for damages for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements and anti-enforcement injunctions where such remedies further the objective of the Convention. However, intra-EU Hague Convention cases may arguably23 not permit remedies for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements as they may infringe the principles of mutual trust and effectiveness of EU law (effet utile) underlying the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The relationship between Article 31(2) of the Brussels I Recast Regulation and Articles 5 and 6 of the Hague Convention is mapped in this article. It will be argued that the Hartley–Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception rather than the norm. This exceptional nature of the right to sue in the non-chosen forum under the Hague Convention can be effectively reconciled with the Brussels I Recast Regulation’s reverse lis pendens rule under Article 31(2). This will usually result in the stay of the proceedings in the non-chosen court as soon as the chosen court is seised. The impact of Brexit on this area of the law is uncertain but it has been argued that the likely outcome post-Brexit is that the regime applicable between the UK and the EU (apart from Denmark) in relation to exclusive jurisdiction agreements within the scope of the Hague Convention will be the Hague Convention.

Keywords
private international law; conflict of laws; international commercial litigation; Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements; Brussels I Recast Regulation; exclusive jurisdiction agreements; choice of court clauses; anti-suit injunctions; parallel proceedings; lis pendens; Brexit; disconnection clauses; treaty interpretation; EU law interpretation

Journal
Journal of Private International Law: Volume 13, Issue 2

StatusPublished
Author(s)Ahmed, Mukarrum; Beaumont, Paul
FundersUniversity of Aberdeen
Publication date31/12/2017
Publication date online23/08/2017
Date accepted by journal30/03/2017
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30370
ISSN1744-1048
eISSN1757-8418
Scroll back to the top