Research output

Chapter (in Edited Book) ()

Clarifying and Expressing Values

Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, Col N, Feldman-Stewart D, Gavaruzzi T, Kryworuchko J, Levin CA, Pieterse A, Reyna V, Stiggelbout A, Scherer L, Wills C & Witteman H (2012) Clarifying and Expressing Values. In: Volk R, Llewellyn-Thomas H (ed.). Update of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration's Background Document, IPDAS Collaboration.

First paragraph: Our evidence review found that existing VCMs were used for a variety of different decisions, rarely referenced underlying theory for their design, but generally were well described in regard to their development process. Listing the pros and cons of a decision was the most common method used. The 13 trials that compared decision support with or without VCMs reached mixed results: some found that VCMs improved some decision-making processes, while others found no effect.

decision aids; standards

StatusPublicly available
EditorVolk R, Llewellyn-Thomas H
AuthorsFagerlin Angela, Pignone Michael, Abhyankar Purva, Col Nananda, Feldman-Stewart Deb, Gavaruzzi Teresa, Kryworuchko Jennifer, Levin Carrie A, Pieterse Arwen, Reyna Valerie, Stiggelbout Anne, Scherer Laura, Wills Celia, Witteman Holly
Publication date2012
PublisherIPDAS Collaboration
© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal