Research output

Article in Journal ()

Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment

Citation
Scarpa R, Campbell D & Hutchinson WG (2007) Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment, Land Economics, 83 (4), pp. 617-634.

Abstract
A multi-attribute, stated-preference approach is used to value low and high impact actions on four major landscape components addressed by the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. Several methodological issues are addressed: the use of prior beliefs on the relative magnitudes of parameters, standardized description of different levels of landscape improvements via image manipulation software, adoption of efficiency-increasing sequential experimental design, and sensitivity of benefit estimates to inclusion of responses from "irrational" respondents. Results suggest that Bayesian design updating delivers significant efficiency gains without loss in respondent efficiency, and estimates are upward-biased when irrational respondents are included.

StatusPublished
AuthorsScarpa Riccardo, Campbell Danny, Hutchinson W George
Publication date11/2007
URLhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27647797
PublisherUniversity of Wisconsin Press
ISSN 0023-7639
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Land Economics: Volume 83, Issue 4 (2007)

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal