Research output

Article in Journal ()

Induction of diploid androgenetic and mitotic gynogenetic Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.)

Citation
Myers JM, Penman D, Basavaraju Y, Powell SF, Baoprasertkul P, Rana K, Bromage NR & McAndrew B (1995) Induction of diploid androgenetic and mitotic gynogenetic Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.), TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 90 (2), pp. 205-210.

Abstract
Androgenesis is a potentially valuable technique for recovering fish from gene banks composed of cryopreserved sperm, developing inbred lines, and analyzing patterns of inheritance. The procedure for producing diploid organisms whose nuclear DNA is wholly of paternal origin is dependent on: (1) the denucleation of "host" eggs, and (2) the inhibition of the first mitotic division in order to double the haploid sperm chromosome complement following fertilization of host eggs. Denucleation of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) eggs was carried out using UV irradiation. Treatment durations of 5-8 rain (total dose of 450-720 J/m 2) produced acceptable yields of viable denucleated eggs [22.9el.6% (eSE) of controls] as estimated by the survival of haploid androgenetic tilapia to 48 h post-fertilization. Successful mitotic inhibition was accomplished using a heat-shock of 42.5~ for 3-4 rain, applied at 2.5-min intervals from 22.5 to 30 min post-fertilization (mpf). The mean survival of androgenetic diploid fish to yolk-sac absorption for treatment groups varied from 0.4% to 5.3%, relative to the controls. Differences in the suceptibility of eggs from different females to UV irradiation were a significant factor in the overall yield of androgenetic diploids. Paternal effects did not significantly influence the androgenetic yield, suggesting that individual males would not be selected against. For comparative purposes mitotic gynogenetic "mitogyne" diploids were produced from UV-irradiated sperm. Mean survival to yolk-sac absorption varied from 0.5% to 10.64%, relative to controls. Similar optima for androgenetic and gynogenetic induction were found in the period 25-27.5 mpf (minutes post-fertilization). Induction treatments would appear to be operating on the same developmental events in both these techniques, and the results suggest that the UV irradiations used do relatively little damage to the eggs beyond nuclear inactivation. The results indicate that the production of androgenetic O. niloticus is possible on a consistent basis and that the application of this technique may be useful in quantitative and conservation genetics.

Keywords
Androgenesis; Gynogenesis; Tilapia Gene bank; Chromosome manipulation

Subject headings
Nile tilapia; Nile Tilapia

StatusPublished
AuthorsMyers James M, Penman David, Basavaraju Yaraguntappa, Powell Stephen F, Baoprasertkul Puttharat, Rana Kausik, Bromage Niall R, McAndrew Brendan
Publication date02/1995
PublisherSpringer
ISSN 0040-5752
LanguageEnglish

Journal
tag Theoretical and Applied Genetics: Volume 90, Issue 2 (1995)

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal