Research output

Article in Journal ()

Review of climate change impacts on marine aquaculture in the UK and Ireland

Citation
Callaway R, Shinn A, Grenfell SE, Bron J, Burnell G, Cook EE, Crumlish M, Culloty S, Davidson K, Ellis RP, Flynn KJ, Fox C, Green D, Hays GC, Hughes AD, Johnston E, Lowe CD, Lupatsch I, Malham SK, Mendzil AF, Nickell T, Pickerell T, Rowley AF, Stanley MS, Tocher DR, Turnbull J, Webb G, Wootton E & Shields RJ (2012) Review of climate change impacts on marine aquaculture in the UK and Ireland, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 22 (3), pp. 389-421.

Abstract

1. Marine aquaculture relies on coastal habitats that will be affected by climate change. This review assesses current knowledge of the threats and opportunities of climate change for aquaculture in the UK and Ireland, focusing on the most commonly farmed species, blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

2. There is sparse evidence to indicate that climate change is affecting aquaculture in the UK and Ireland. Impacts to date have been difficult to discern from natural environmental variability, and the pace of technological development in aquaculture overshadows effects of climatic change. However, this review of broader aquaculture literature and the likely effects of climate change suggests that over the next century, climate change has the potential to directly impact the industry.

3. Impacts are related to the industry's dependence on the marine environment for suitable biophysical conditions. For instance, changes in the frequency and strength of storms pose a risk to infrastructure, such as salmon cages. Sea-level rise will shift shoreline morphology, reducing the areal extent of some habitats that are suitable for the industry. Changes in rainfall patterns will increase the turbidity and nutrient loading of rivers, potentially triggering harmful algal blooms and negatively affecting bivalve farming. In addition, ocean acidification may disrupt the early developmental stages of shellfish.

4. Some of the most damaging but least predictable effects of climate change relate to the emergence, translocation and virulence of diseases, parasites and pathogens, although parasites and diseases in finfish aquaculture may be controlled through intervention. The spread of nuisance and non-native species is also potentially damaging.

5. Rising temperatures may create the opportunity to rear warmer water species in theUKand Ireland. Market forces, rather than technical feasibility, are likely to determine whether existing farmed species are displaced by new ones.

Keywords
Aquaculture; climate change; pollution; water quality; disease; fish; invertebrates; algae; coastal; littoral; estuary; habitat

StatusPublished
AuthorsCallaway Ruth, Shinn Andrew, Grenfell Suzanne E, Bron James, Burnell Gavin, Cook Elizabeth E, Crumlish Margaret, Culloty Sarah, Davidson Keith, Ellis Robert P, Flynn Kevin J, Fox Clive, Green Darren, Hays Graeme C, Hughes Adam D, Johnston Erin, Lowe Christopher D, Lupatsch Ingrid, Malham Shelagh K, Mendzil Anouska F, Nickell Thom, Pickerell Tom, Rowley Andrew F, Stanley Michele S, Tocher Douglas R, Turnbull James, Webb Gemma, Wootton Emma, Shields Robin J
Publication date05/2012
PublisherWiley
ISSN 1052-7613
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems: Volume 22, Issue 3 (2012)

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal