Research output

Article in Journal

Taboo trade-off aversion: a discrete choice model and empirical analysis (Forthcoming/Available Online)

Citation
Chorus C, Pudane B, Mouter N & Campbell D (2017) Taboo trade-off aversion: a discrete choice model and empirical analysis (Forthcoming/Available Online), Journal of Choice Modelling.

Abstract
An influential body of literature in moral psychology suggests that decision makers consider trade-offs morally problematic, or taboo, when the attributes traded off against each other belong to different ‘spheres’, such as friendship versus market transactions. This study is the first to model and empirically explore taboo trade-off aversion in a discrete choice context. To capture possible taboo trade-off aversion, we propose to extend the conventional linear in parameters logit model by including penalties for taboo trade-offs. Using this model, we then explore the presence (and size) of taboo trade-off aversion in a data set specifically collected for this purpose. Results, based on estimation of a variety of (Mixed) Logit models with and without taboo trade-off penalties, suggest that there is indeed a significant and sizeable taboo trade-off aversion underlying choice behaviour of respondents.

StatusIn press
AuthorsChorus Caspar, Pudane Baiba, Mouter Niek, Campbell Danny
Publication date online04/10/2017
Date accepted by journal13/09/2017
URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/…1755534517300684
PublisherElsevier
ISSN 1755-5345
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Journal of Choice Modelling

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal