Research output

Article in Journal

Lottery Judgments: a philosophical and experimental study (Forthcoming/Available Online)

Citation
Ebert P, Smith M & Durbach I (2017) Lottery Judgments: a philosophical and experimental study (Forthcoming/Available Online), Philosophical Psychology.

Abstract
In this paper, we present the results of two surveys that investigate subjects’ judgments about what can be known or justifiably believed about lottery out- comes on the basis of statistical evidence, testimonial evidence, and ‘mixed’ evidence, while considering possible anchoring and priming effects. We dis- cuss these results in light of seven distinct hypotheses that capture various claims made by philosophers about lay people’s lottery judgments. We con- clude by summarizing the main findings, pointing to future research, and comparing our findings to recent studies by Turri and Friedman (2014) and Friedman and Turri (2015).

Keywords
Knowledge; justified belief; lottery proposition; statistical evidence; testimonial evidence; behavioral decision-making

StatusIn press
AuthorsEbert Philip, Smith Martin, Durbach Ian
Publication date online21/09/2017
Date accepted by journal12/06/2017
PublisherTaylor and Francis
ISSN 0951-5089
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Philosophical Psychology

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal