Research output

Article in Journal ()

Dichotomising dementia: is there another way?

Citation
McParland P, Kelly F & Innes A (2017) Dichotomising dementia: is there another way?, Sociology of Health and Illness, 39 (2), pp. 258-269.

Abstract
This article discusses the reduction of the complex experience of dementia to a dichotomised ‘tragedy’ or ‘living well’ discourse in contemporary Western society. We explore both discourses, placing them in the context of a successful ageing paradigm, highlighting the complex nature of dementia and the risks associated with the emergence of these arguably competing discourses. Specifically, we explore this dichotomy in the context of societal understandings and responses to dementia. We argue for an acceptance of the fluid nature of the dementia experience, and the importance of an understanding that recognises the multiple realities of dementia necessary for social inclusion to occur. Such an acceptance requires that, rather than defend one position over another, the current discourse on dementia is challenged and problematised so that a more nuanced understanding of dementia may emerge; one that fully accepts the paradoxical nature of this complex condition.

Keywords
dementia/Alzheimer's; discourse; social change; ageing

StatusPublished
AuthorsMcParland Patricia, Kelly Fiona, Innes Anthea
Publication date02/2017
Publication date online08/02/2017
Date accepted by journal11/02/2016
URL2017
PublisherWiley-Blackwell for Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness
ISSN 0141-9889
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Sociology of Health and Illness: Volume 39, Issue 2 (2017)

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal