Research output

Article in Journal ()

Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A reply

Citation
Dow S (2005) Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A reply, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27 (3), pp. 385-391.

Abstract
Paul Davidson has criticized Babylonian thought as supporting an "anything goes" approach to Post Keynesian economics. This note explains Babylonian thought, not as the dual of classical logic but as another form of logic that is rigorous in light of the nonergodic nature of social systems, and the uncertainty this entails. It is argued that Babylonian thought is one way of understanding Keynes's "ordinary logic," while Davidson's use of the term "axiomatic" appears problematic. But the ergodic axiom is so compatible with the open-systems ontology on which Babylonian thought is based that there is, in fact, scope for broad agreement.

Keywords
logic; Post Keynesian methodology; Babylonian thought; axioms

StatusPublished
AuthorsDow Sheila
Publication date2005
Publication date online08/12/2014
URLhttp://www.tandfonline.com/…77.2005.11051453
PublisherM E Sharpe
ISSN 0160-3477
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics: Volume 27, Issue 3

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal