Research output

Article in Journal ()

Early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing: what works, for whom and in what circumstances? Protocol for a realist review

Citation
Coles E, Cheyne H & Daniel B (2015) Early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing: what works, for whom and in what circumstances? Protocol for a realist review, Systematic Reviews, 4, Art. No.: 79.

Abstract

Background: Child health and wellbeing is influenced by multiple factors, all of which can impact on early childhood development. Adverse early life experiences can have lasting effects across the life course, sustaining inequalities and resulting in negative consequences for the health and wellbeing of individuals and society. The potential to influence future outcomes via early intervention is widely accepted; there are numerous policy initiatives, programmes and interventions clustered around the early years theme, resulting in a broad and disparate evidence base. Existing reviews have addressed the effectiveness of early years interventions, yet there is a knowledge gap regarding the mechanisms underlying why interventions work in given contexts.

Methods/design: This realist review seeks to address the question ‘what works, for whom and in what circumstances?' in terms of early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing. The review will be conducted following Pawson's five-stage iterative realist methodology: (1) clarify scope, (2) search for evidence, (3) appraise primary studies and extract data, (4) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions and (5) disseminate findings. The reviewers will work with stakeholders in the early stages to refine the focus of the review, create a review framework and build programme theory. Searches for primary evidence will be conducted iteratively. Data will be extracted and tested against the programme theory. A review collaboration group will oversee the review process.

Discussion: The review will demonstrate how early years interventions do or do not work in different contexts and with what outcomes and effects. Review findings will be written up following the RAMESES guidelines and will be disseminated via a report, presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015017832

Keywords
realist review; realist synthesis; early years; child health; maternal health; child development; wellbeing; health inequalities; early intervention

StatusPublished
AuthorsColes Emma, Cheyne Helen, Daniel Brigid
Publication date06/06/2015
Publication date online06/06/2015
Date accepted by journal01/06/2015
PublisherBioMed Central
ISSN 2046-4053
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Systematic Reviews: Volume 4

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal