Research output

Article in Journal ()

Evaluation of marking and tagging methods for genetic studies in carp

Citation
Basavaraju Y, Devi BSR, Mukthayakka G, Reddy LP, Mair GC, Roderick E & Penman D (1998) Evaluation of marking and tagging methods for genetic studies in carp, Journal of Biosciences, 23 (5), pp. 585-593.

Abstract
A variety of marking and tagging methods were tested on common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) with the aim of identifying suitable methods for genetic studies in this and other species of carp. Elastomer and Alcian blue dye marking; Cold and Silver nitrate branding; Floy, Fingerling, Carlin disc and visible implant tags; and fin clipping were all tested on a range of sizes of common carp (from mean weights of 10-25 g up to 600-800 g). The branding and tagging methods tested did not give satisfactory retention rates. A combination of elastomer marking and fin clipping was then tested as a method for strain identification in a growth comparison trial on catla (Catla catla Hamilton) and found to be satisfactory for this purpose. Passive integrated transponders (PIT) tags were used to individually identify catla of wild or hatchery origin being grown for use as broodstock. These had almost 100% (98.8%) retention rates, but are expensive compared to most other tagging methods.

Keywords
marking; tagging; genetics; carp

StatusPublished
AuthorsBasavaraju Yaraguntappa, Devi B S Renuka, Mukthayakka G, Reddy L Purushotham, Mair Graham C, Roderick Eric, Penman David
Publication date12/1998
PublisherSpringer
ISSN 0250-5991
LanguageEnglish

Journal
Journal of Biosciences: Volume 23, Issue 5 (DEC 1998)

© University of Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland UK • Telephone +44 1786 473171 • Scottish Charity No SC011159
My Portal